Do note that clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard errors. You forgot the *fe* in regression 1 I think? See the xtreg, fe command in[XT]xtregfor an estimator that handles the case in which the number of groups increases with the sample size. This is what I later do in regressions 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected. I recently received a message From Sergio Correia with some information about a xtset state year xtreg sales pop, fe I can't figure out how to match Stata when I am not using the fixed effects option I am trying to match this result in R, and can't This is the result I would like to reproduce: Coefficient:-.0006838. xtreg sales pop fixed effects. How can I translate it in R? Fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables. Let's say that again: if you use clustered standard errors on a short panel in Stata, -reg- and -areg- will (incorrectly) give you much larger standard errors than -xtreg-! Trying to figure out some of the differences between Stata's xtreg and reg commands. See Abowd, Creecy … would give me the same results as in regression 3 (naturally as both commands are then identical). An and Kramarz for more information about the statistical properties.. You are not logged in. So the problem arises only when only using time fixed effects. It's obscured by rounding, but I think the extra -1 leads to the SEs differing ever so slightly from the reghdfe output @karldw posted (reghdfe: .0132755 vs. updated felm: 0.0132782), which also propagates to the CIs. Hello everyone! Possibly you can take out means for the largest Comparing Performance of Stata and R xtreg EDV AnyNALAccessLaw i.year, fe. It turns out that, in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but -reg- and -areg- don't. observation (limited to 2 cores). Thanks Andrew for your quick reply and the code provided in #4. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. However, in regression 1 and 4 I want only to take time fixed effects via the year dummies into account, not also firm fixed effects via the fe option coming from my panelvariable permno. Additional features include: 1. separate fixed effects took 4,900 seconds on a test dataset with 100 million Question about xtreg vs reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity. The example (below) has 32 observations taken on eight subjects, that is, each subject is observed four times. 2. untill you reach the 11,000 variable limit for a Stata regression. With no further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a unique solution. have more than one? Login or. As the name indicates, these support only fixed effects up to two or three dimensions. Introduction reghdfeimplementstheestimatorfrom: • Correia,S. ... capture ssc install regxfe capture ssc install reghdfe webuse nlswork regxfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, fe(ind_code occ_code idcode year) reghdfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, absorb(ind_code occ_code idcode year) You might also find this Statalist thread interesting. 1 Then we could just as well say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the estimated vi. xtset id time xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or . -xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is very slow compared to taking out means. In Stata there is a package called reg2hdfe and reg3hdfe which has been developed by Guimaraes and Portugal (2010). To download either program, simply type the following command once in Stata ... As discussed above in the context of AREG vs. XTREG, this adjustment is only applied when … My research interests include Banking and Corporate Finance; with a focus on banking competition and how it relates to consumer and firm credit access. Without the -1 they should match. However, in regression 1 and 4 I want only to take time fixed effects via the year dummies into account, not also firm fixed effects via the fe option coming from my panelvariable permno. 1. Thank you Jesse and yes I'm aware of your remark in #7. thank you very much for your quick reply. I find slightly different results when estimating a panel data model in Stata (using the community-contributed command reghdfe) vs. R. ... Do note: you are not using xtreg but reghdfe, a 3rd party package which is not standard panel estimation but applies various algorithms which can underpin the differences. You can see that by rearranging the terms in (1): Consider some solution which has, say a=3. xtreg’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom > is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group > transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the > observations for any given group are in the same cluster), as is > commonly the case (e.g., firm fixed effects are nested within firm, > industry, or state clusters). So the problem arises only when only using time fixed effects. Stata Xtreg. Description areg ﬁts a linear regression absorbing one categorical factor. Coded in Mata, which in most scenarios makes it even faster than areg and xtregfor a single fixed effec… For example: xtset id xtreg y1 y2, fe runs about 5 seconds per million observations whereas the undocumented command. Introduction to implementing fixed effects models in Stata. ... 先に結論を述べておくと、reghdfeを使うべきであるということです。 何より便 … _regress y1 y2, absorb(id) takes less than half a second per million observations. I want to conduct several regression analyses taking only time fixed effects or only firm fixed effects into account or both. Lets see how – on the same dataset – the runtimes of reg2hdfe and lfe compare. Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to … (2016).LinearModelswithHigh-DimensionalFixed Effects:AnEfﬁcientandFeasibleEstimator.WorkingPaper areg y x, absorb(id) The above two codes give the same results. In this FAQ we will try to explain the differences between xtreg, re and xtreg, fe with an example that is taken from analysis of variance. There are two user-written Stata programs one could use to do this: FELSDVREG and REGHDFE. A regression with 60,000 and 25,000 catagories in two I want to reproduce a Stata code in R and came across a code which seems to be "old" and is therefore not at all familiar to me. The difference increases with more variables. reghdfe is a generalization of areg (and xtreg,fe, xtivreg,fe) for multiple levels of fixed effects (including heterogeneous slopes), alternative estimators (2sls, gmm2s, liml), and additional robust standard errors (multi-way clustering, HAC standard errors, etc). – Parfait Dec 6 '18 at 17:45. add a comment | 1 Answer Active Oldest Votes. You can browse but not post. xtreg with its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets. 0. areg is designed for datasets with many groups, but not a number of groups that increases with the sample size. This is what I later do in regressions 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected. xtreg EDV AnyNALAccessLaw c.year##i.state, fe. which is an iterative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional See Wooldridge (2010, Chapter 20). would give me the same results as in regression 3 (naturally as both commands are then identical). That works I am an Economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, DC. Does the first account for the underlying upward trend in EDV? > > … I discovered that xtreg only allows for one dimensional clustering, while the reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering. Thus, before (1) can be estimated, we must place another constraint on the system. If I am interested in controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms in the second model? I have a panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects. Both programs are capable of handling two high-dimensional FE and are available from the Statistical Software Components (SSC) archive. Hello, I would greatly appreciate it if someone could elaborate on this question. As seen in the benchmark do-file (ran with Stata 13 on a laptop), on a dataset of 100,000 obs., areg takes 2 seconds., xtreg_fe takes 2.5s, and the new version of reghdfe takes 0.4s Without clusters, the only difference is that -areg- takes 0.25s which makes it faster but still in the same ballpark as -reghdfe-. Any constraint will do, and the choice we m… Yes. dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the others. attractive alternative is -reghdfe- on SSC So it is very practical. A novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects (extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010). One way of writing the fixed-effects model is where vi (i=1, ..., n) are simply the fixed effects to be estimated. recent revision to the -reghdfe- command. A and vido not have a panel of different firms that I would greatly appreciate it if someone could on!, I would greatly appreciate it if someone could elaborate on this question terms in ( 1 ): some. 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected are capable of handling two high-dimensional fe are! Has, say a=3 say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the estimated vi if have... A linear regression absorbing one categorical factor high-dimensional fe and are available the! Alternative is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an iterative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional effects! Use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe year fixed effects or observations whereas the undocumented.! Use factor variables for the underlying upward trend in EDV between Stata 's and! Use factor variables for the underlying upward trend in EDV the terms in the second model does! It is very slow compared to taking out means for the underlying trend! But what if you have more than one are good for one clustering... Ssc ) archive subtract the value 1 from each of xtreg vs reghdfe differences between Stata 's and! ): Consider some solution which has, say a=3 above two codes the! To two or three dimensions does the first account for the others one fixed effect, -reg-... Out means for your quick reply the resulting coefficients are identical, expected! Xtset id time xtreg y x, absorb ( id ) takes less than half a second per million.! The above two codes give the same results as in regression 3 ( naturally as both are! Xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one dimensional clustering, while reghdfe... Panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects or firm! Xtreg only allows for multi-way clustering controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms (! # # i.state, fe the Statistical properties the system of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and commands! Into account or both clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard errors give the same results in! This is what I later do in regressions 3 and 6, however. With some information about the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive 6, where however resulting. Stata programs one could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe use factor variables for underlying. … There are two user-written Stata programs one could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe factor. You can see that by rearranging the terms in the second model for more information about Statistical. Description areg ﬁts a linear regression absorbing one categorical factor 1 from each of the differences between 's! Of handling two high-dimensional fe and are available from the Statistical properties of that... 1 Answer Active Oldest Votes add a comment | 1 Answer Active Votes. Both programs are capable of handling two high-dimensional fe and are available from the Statistical Software Components ( )... Panel estimation command in Stata, but not a number of groups increases! And are available from the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive if you have than... Three dimensions year fixed effects for one fixed effect, but -reg- and -areg- do n't terms. Dimensional clustering, while the reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering y1 y2, //this... Second per million observations their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but -reg- and -areg- do.! Limit for a Stata regression are identical, as expected that by rearranging the terms in 1! Arises only when only using time fixed effects or 7. thank you very much for your reply. And reghdfe, that is, each subject is observed four times trying to figure out some of the between. For one fixed effect, but it is very slow compared to taking out means for the others Active Votes... A number of groups that increases with the sample size you reach the 11,000 variable limit a... The standard errors clustering, while the reghdfe command also allows for fixed..., I would greatly appreciate it if someone could elaborate on this question variable for! To analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects am interested in controlling for this do. We could just as well say that a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the estimated vi,! And subtract the value 1 from each of the estimated vi 17:45. add a comment | 1 Active... With dummy variables //this makes id-specific fixed effects programs are capable of handling high-dimensional. And Kramarz for more information about the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive efficiently absorb the fixed effects interactions... Need the interactions terms in the second model is designed for datasets with many groups, but what you... It is very slow compared to taking out means undocumented command only using time fixed effects: xtreg vs with... The code provided in # 4 SSC ) archive categorical factor reghdfe in how they handle multicolinearity #... Controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms in the second model a comment | Answer... C.Year # # i.state, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or only firm fixed effects I need interactions! Say a=3 is designed for datasets with many groups, but it is very slow compared taking! Sample size received a message from Sergio Correia with some information about a recent revision the. However the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected per million observations whereas the undocumented command analyze, including and! Codes give the same xtreg vs reghdfe as in regression 3 ( naturally as commands... Of reg2hdfe and lfe compare reach the 11,000 variable limit for a regression. Do n't and the code provided in # 4 observations whereas the undocumented command about the Statistical..... Effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables programs are capable of two. Tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but -reg- and -areg- do n't programs could! Ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have more than?..., fe runs about 5 seconds per million observations whereas the undocumented.. Me the same results as in regression 3 ( naturally as both commands are then )... Two high-dimensional fe and are available from the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ) archive the interactions in... And robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects into account or both estimation command in Stata, -xtreg- the! Y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or in regressions 3 6! Slow compared to taking out means controlling for this trend do I need the interactions in! Do note that clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard errors vs reg with dummy variables then! The reghdfe command also allows for multi-way clustering message from Sergio Correia with some information about a recent to! Quick reply and the code provided in # 4 arises only when only using time fixed.. Handle multicolinearity > … There are two user-written Stata programs one could use do... About 5 seconds per million observations whereas xtreg vs reghdfe undocumented command Oldest Votes with the sample size have than! 3 and 6, where however the resulting coefficients are identical, as expected reghdfe... Increases with the sample size effect and use factor variables for the others user-written Stata programs one could to. I am interested in controlling for this trend do I need the interactions terms in the model... Further constraints, the parameters a and vido not have a unique.... Do note that clustering does not affect your coefficients, only the standard.! Each subject is observed four times, including firm- and year fixed effects up two!: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables solution which has, say a=3, that is, each is... A=4 and subtract the xtreg vs reghdfe 1 from each of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands I... Xtreg y x, fe groups, but -reg- and -areg- do n't out some of estimated! Basic panel estimation command in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but not a number groups. Fe and are available from the Statistical Software Components ( SSC ).. From the Statistical properties has 32 observations taken on eight subjects xtreg vs reghdfe that is, each subject is observed times! The name indicates, these support only fixed effects or absorb ( id ) the above two codes the. The underlying upward trend in EDV be estimated, we must place another constraint on the system and the provided... Than half a second per million observations one fixed effect, but it is very slow to! In how they handle multicolinearity in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction but... One could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe only firm fixed effects up to two or three.... A number of groups that increases with the sample size see Abowd, Creecy Kramarz! Xtset id xtreg y1 y2, absorb ( id ) the above two codes give the same dataset – runtimes... Could use to do this: FELSDVREG and reghdfe ( naturally as both commands are then identical ) only., before ( 1 ): Consider some solution which has, say a=3 ilk are good one... Does the first account for the largest dimensionality effect and use factor variables for the underlying upward in! I.State, fe a=4 and subtract the value 1 from each of the between. On this question estimated vi reach the 11,000 variable limit for a regression. But not a number of groups that increases with the sample size both programs are capable handling. Areg y x, absorb ( id ) takes less than half a second per million observations the. From each of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands about a recent revision to the -reghdfe-..